Government Contracting
USDA's Rural Development Programs
The United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Rural Development Program is tasked with improving rural America by distributing loans and grants. One such program, the Repowering Assistance Program, makes payments to those biorefineries that use renewable biomass over fossil fuels when choosing a fuel source to power their facilities. According to Section 9004 of the Repowering Assistance Program, a biorefinery is only eligible to receive grant money if it is at least 51% owned by U.S. citizens or U.S. nationals. Many U.S. subsidiaries employ tens of thousands of U.S. workers, invest into the U.S. economy, and could benefit from these payments, but will not be eligible to apply. On June 15th, 2010 OFII submitted comments to the USDA addressing this discriminatory “citizenship requirement.”
OFII faced a similar issue last year. The Bioenergy Program for Advanced Biofuels offered grant money to only those companies that had majority American ownership. OFII wrote a letter in support of U.S. Senator Brownback’s amendment to the FY10 Agriculture Appropriations bill, which would eliminate discriminatory eligibility requirements for private sector participation. The Brownback amendment ultimately failed in conference committee. OFII continues to work with a bipartisan group of concerned lawmakers to remove discriminatory and unnecessary eligibility restrictions.
OFII DOCUMENTS:
OFII comments to USDA regarding Repowering Assistance Program; June 15, 2010
OFII Letter in Support of Amendment; September 30, 2009
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING
From performing advanced research in clean energy technology to providing the latest defense technologies and supplying emergency vaccines, U.S. subsidiaries actively partner with the U.S. Government on issues of critical importance. Although U.S. subsidiaries employ millions of American workers, their “foreign” heritage is frequently leveraged against them to overturn existing contracts or deny access to new government contracts. OFII opposes such discriminatory restrictions and works to ensure an open, competitive U.S. procurement process.
Read More...Policymakers periodically push measures intended to limit government contracts to companies that manufacture products made with a certain percentage of domestic content – some proposals have gone as high to require 100 percent. Examples of discriminatory domestic content provisions were recently seen in President Obama’s proposed America Jobs Act and in legislation introduced by Congressmen Nick Rahall (D-WV). OFII opposes domestic content restrictions because they result in costly and unrealistic new regulations for small businesses and multinational companies whose businesses rely...
Read More...OFII advocates for non-discriminatory treatment of foreign companies and their U.S. subsidiaries in the bidding process for the management of state and local infrastructure projects, including public-private partnerships. Recent examples of PPPs where discriminatory, anti-Insourcing rhetoric was employed in the debate includes the Pennsylvania Toll Road project in 2008.
Read More...The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a funding notice (FOA) in June 2009 blocking Insourcing companies from applying for projects $150 million in R&D funding through the ARPA-E program. OFII worked to educate the DOE and Members of Congress about the negative consequences of cutting out American Insourcing companies. In late 2009, the DOE officially stated that Insourcing companies were eligible to bid for future rounds of the program.
Read More...The United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Rural Development Program is tasked with improving rural America by distributing loans and grants. One such program, the Repowering Assistance Program, makes payments to those biorefineries that use renewable biomass over fossil fuels when choosing a fuel source to power their facilities. According to Section 9004 of the Repowering Assistance Program, a biorefinery is only eligible to receive grant money if it is at least 51% owned by U.S. citizens or U.S. nationals. Many U.S. subsidiaries employ tens of thousands of U.S. workers, invest into...
Read More...
